- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old
; V/ G8 v8 [% [6 I2 B$ lBoy Induced by Indirect Topical# s1 o- {9 c, z6 o# k3 D
Exposure to Testosterone
7 V; f% j( e; q) w2 j1 oSamar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2, f3 W u9 M! l- ~4 L
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
( O" V) t* T- ] M# pClinical Pediatrics
9 w6 G2 t- D+ G4 \1 P4 |- rVolume 46 Number 6; W# h' J% U: G3 ]
July 2007 540-5431 Y' U$ E, f- s* H3 p6 R" v
© 2007 Sage Publications& J3 {' A* I$ i4 s& r2 i% g& S
10.1177/0009922806296651
. [9 m8 x4 l6 M. Ehttp://clp.sagepub.com
) [7 Y$ |6 b! M* T# F* o/ I* Qhosted at
+ Z- f. X U9 Uhttp://online.sagepub.com
; y3 ]0 F6 a& r* y" N# E' v0 S8 CPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
' F' ~0 T2 W7 l& a5 h, N6 Xis a significant concern for physicians. Central1 h/ i# E) D; r' I( I( j
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated) j0 n% g2 |! ~$ j, Y
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
4 v% M: Q% p: h }' H: B! Na higher incidence of organic central nervous system. F1 L* `% t; T: y6 ]% l) p5 J+ V
lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested. y K+ }' _% {+ @
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
0 o) t4 y$ G$ ^' A5 V% U9 {hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-9 t8 m1 i2 ~" {7 K
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
- a* W2 ]! H, U( x7 ^* L3 O1 z& R3 ?8 d7 Hreport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the/ i, J" h0 S4 u" x% d. U
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-; ?7 F6 l0 {! A# ]+ s. n( J3 J
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due4 T7 M4 Q5 ~! f+ Y3 S6 P+ q
to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
$ x8 V N$ _! e- e7 |. ]the father. The family initially concealed this infor-0 z+ F! K7 ~- R: n3 N: d
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
6 x0 i( Y' K, B1 f$ {. Kchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of& P9 X. J/ c/ }
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-
" S, F& G# _1 W/ gbly more common than the rare case report in the
; p) H ?( W1 g! s8 a. Y; l8 ~literature.4
1 n3 z2 w5 f6 xPatient Report* _0 c w# p; \$ P' [
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the7 \2 k6 U3 V9 o5 a
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern0 ]- C* f4 A9 O4 v" g, i
of early sexual development. His mother noticed
0 e G! e1 R7 E7 `light colored pubic hair development when he was
7 L4 u0 F+ f, k. G5 EFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
, U# z0 I) p; tSouth Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
: R& _" u7 q7 ]" W5 b; x& [. ~, x. iAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
/ E Z5 a* v( [5 q' }( b* a+ aProfessor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
1 ?9 e8 a4 Y& M" d* zMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
/ Y+ q8 w" ~- E: N: Qe-mail: [email protected].4 c7 `: a6 Z5 t! a
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
& o8 ^6 B) D" |" ^darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
+ `2 q/ H6 L7 @+ kment of his penis and frequent erections. The child' u) z" V/ Z" ^( K6 e# A
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
/ D8 A* r8 @0 i/ Z" _" Wa birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of3 L5 f1 m/ K9 C
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
' S- o2 {' {. A( S' Gof life and was still receiving breast milk along with
% b3 W9 b8 W4 F" S! usolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,( w) b! \6 T% a
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development* I/ G1 l; H- W5 {; h! V% C6 W' C( ^2 a" G
was age appropriate.
7 u! Z3 C8 R! E( r! IThe family history was remarkable for the father,$ { M, W- e* X; ]( E
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
) @. r7 b j5 x _, G1 Bwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
1 j3 f4 j' r4 {6 F/ S- ^/ ?height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
# `6 r# q, L3 J7 K& Q$ L# h- Cearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
4 X0 k' N4 V6 }* B/ g1 _' }The father denied taking any other medication. The
% S7 y( K& B. ` _) r# ~ ~child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche3 ]4 t# M' o& N- R( P/ h
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet; _% {- w! L6 v2 X0 H+ Q( T2 m2 l' l: z
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-* m/ M7 Y, e# j1 i9 a
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
$ p3 p* T% s+ w" j. @; O, r2 Wtives. There were no siblings.
( K& R' D% x% _4 ]5 `Physical Examination# T2 |' Y- p5 O3 m! ^; @" K h
The physical examination revealed a very active,
/ Y3 X& A( M- e' T# |! J$ _playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented/ S p: D3 e: r$ z& @" q5 A
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
. ]& l7 {- a6 j90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
) `3 w' ?* H0 ?- \(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
/ m h& Y0 a M/ @7 n' ?velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
- b2 A: A6 W- C3 u% Cthe neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.( o: l7 f! G o! [( B; X6 G
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for* \+ ?. F3 }" z
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
& R) e) K) U; I ]& c, z) _; B8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well" ~5 z$ t+ e/ H2 [/ v5 ]. T# Z2 @$ C
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
0 D$ r) o% d' V j540; | I2 Q2 u* G- B: j" A
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
- k5 W! M, g1 w/ A, Z, S5 pthe base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The+ x& V7 ~4 g, n9 L6 I2 `
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.
$ O$ n/ G+ d0 f! c% J/ A) ~5 dThe skin was moist and smooth and somewhat3 J) C4 K3 ~" {3 r- m
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
e* g2 X1 i% y7 ?% D8 V) j/ _abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
" u7 A+ v8 c8 Y' R" |* ~2 BNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
% z* i' N9 ~) G! obilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion+ C! G+ g5 U" H9 b
of papilledema.
7 W% C( w4 K9 D: S+ S1 |/ XLaboratory Evaluation
0 r8 M- Q2 m) z( n* DThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by s- x# ~' o+ L1 D) ~
using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-( h! D1 d/ N* Q5 e" P' M E
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
; R! e. B L$ ?4 Y9 Lkaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
1 J4 }1 Q& T# S# g, u ushowed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-2 t9 S6 B* O$ {
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
9 R3 W1 M" p3 s; Q9 s0 R5 _The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood6 s+ F, o- p+ g% d+ u
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
/ i; S! X C1 n8 o$ D- Vwithin normal range for his age. The concentration
( Z$ N U/ o7 e, W* `8 b6 uof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
. z; ]7 Z: V! X& R d. o(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 203 W; j0 Q1 X9 p% { ~
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-( u+ P \$ i0 @( z
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
5 o# y- v8 W- y! o# y$ n L$ H0 B* odesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to1 }1 v! O% I& E/ G5 }; H1 B# n: F0 r+ }
49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)% Z: ?7 h% D: X9 j3 A8 U0 K; }
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-" Z! [+ w! t4 a7 H% P$ u( J- I- d
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
& J' p( c3 V7 J5 Gtestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),9 C8 g- r1 h# Z y) f% c7 P9 u. A1 t
and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than' S: s4 H4 m' c Q. G: T ~" v
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular' J: y; C# R3 f* W
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone: I" o: A. p* l& e: V* Q
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL3 |7 E4 j+ Z7 i* Y( B0 h
(prepubertal).' v+ e3 A. F5 b5 g2 V
The parents were notified about the laboratory
3 a% b; {" P4 ]5 `% Cresults and were informed that all of the tests were
1 Y/ K. M" n6 z. p: g0 u2 pnormal except the testosterone level was high. The
6 g$ j+ G4 F/ d# tfollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
, l5 v( r$ m4 L4 Z' g f6 ? kobtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-1 j* d0 v0 t2 ?7 x% \- O* O' Q
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
^: d* j0 A+ [" j9 u |3 WPhysical examination at this time revealed that the, q5 o+ S; D1 y1 d# r: v0 Z6 M
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
# T5 a7 u* ]. Q: ^2 u, E! `" M2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained, _5 X8 w3 k$ e9 d( g3 l# P p, [
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-% F6 z, f+ v7 n6 g. k* H& F8 O
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
6 Z1 w3 n; a8 P5 L$ othe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
# f3 Z7 w8 ~, @8 JmL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
, J+ z+ J; q( ]2 @! o! uThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-
* J: z4 k4 ~" \8 V) j0 zing frequent erections. g v9 O8 R- ? q4 ?
Both parents were again questioned about use of
) J3 w0 z5 D9 e3 y* T+ R$ e5 t3 \" Nany ointment/creams that they may have applied to
& J- @7 v3 L9 ?& E/ J$ lthe child’s skin. This time the father admitted the4 `3 p8 V8 i( }9 I" J
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
1 `5 p$ h* z7 U' G+ Y/ U$ @use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
! h! T. Z/ v7 T! A! _: g7 x1 L& A) [ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
8 v) ?. E- @, J( `' ka year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
4 X$ B0 \- t/ h8 i& Y6 Q$ kto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
% R- H; d$ z; l; m& j" Zscribed by his family physician for decreased libido
/ B, B# Q/ y* N' A5 j Q4 dsecondary to depression.
3 F; h% u& c7 `* Q0 N% I+ m rThe child slept in the same bed with parents.
. n' E$ E7 y& {+ ~3 j9 c0 f. P' _/ o5 TThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his
4 Y/ c" ~/ k* o* e9 f2 qchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-5 {0 z6 W; i$ X6 X: `- P
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.6 I& A. v( o. y1 n* ~" L, Q
The father also admitted that after the phone call,
' g: G1 l# q6 twhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby
# s& M) y! y) ]3 z& F* u' O- h) ^was high, he then read the product information2 G; C3 k( R% r1 ?6 T/ m, ^
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-; [% b& l% x2 f
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
0 M4 M" ~3 P2 O5 Odecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the0 W! `: @/ t7 |7 o; ]% A
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had& C! L; Y# b* b8 F
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
. h! Q! `) Y% f; I- N8 Ltest was ordered, but the family did not go to the$ E8 i+ m2 I: b) C4 g0 K9 h
laboratory to obtain the test.
5 w/ l! h$ \5 H. c' ^0 UDiscussion+ c; B: t' U' u% I& z
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary" P2 n: |) w6 S
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,47 d1 I2 {% F J4 O5 ?/ X
Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when7 d6 f8 w, d! [
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-" a B; t* d. L0 w
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
+ A; S% k9 K0 q+ a6 Gmon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP( f' N5 @5 Q/ F
may have a central nervous system lesion that is
7 O' Y1 }3 M+ d" [responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-/ ?+ e6 j- s1 ?* ^1 C7 }
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
( D: O% f- ~) y' usis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in$ l* X2 p0 t3 u* b, {, J9 f
boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
7 Z: C$ |2 B: F. `ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
) w" F/ j* H7 J$ [* W: M1 ~# Rrical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
9 z. h; e, h# A' a- E- rgonadotropins.1,3
R F9 S, u5 A, z! m! |: n* lGonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
; L) h& K2 T; ~* J1 g* L- qcious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate5 j( p9 q I4 t0 j
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or3 ]9 z" T8 L" z/ S: w
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-9 }: F) ?0 U# U1 a
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing0 |& }5 q9 ]0 @/ O* e
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
! u# \$ M4 N) z) _adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
2 {8 d3 M% T1 B" A: hpuberty in boys.3,4) ]$ K* f D- H$ _7 o }
The most common form of congenital adrenal
/ y }& ~# i$ Q5 N. zhyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency., L; @4 {4 _& `$ B
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in* X# }4 U1 m) W: [7 e7 D
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
0 E. l# ^+ N. W) k$ qan adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen5 R. r8 R c# R! R
excess.1,3) n5 `7 p6 O b6 I% r9 f
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from t" w% h" t6 [2 r. m% [! r
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
/ J0 q* D: m% e: b% B" z0 m+ CA unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
$ l8 Y/ | u9 u! ~2 bindependent precocious puberty, which is also known3 [4 g& Y- f% Z* Q0 O
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
8 c# z3 i H! Zvery young age. The physical findings in these boys
" J( I: t8 w3 l' ?. i1 ^9 }- i4 dwith this disorder are full pubertal development,8 n2 ]& n9 a% _: D7 o. v, m
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys. \& d# g% \+ r9 [# f
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder3 D( f) s- A. I$ M+ q$ ?# i& @: Q5 j
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
6 P9 B$ G; H% W) z C6 lpubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
- y0 V6 y0 _- r, s- I) h7 Yreleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
, X9 K9 ~% O# }8 g# p. x3 `0 C- uautosomal dominant disorder that affects only
* B# h' G; N1 g- |9 @- \: W: smales; therefore, other male members of the family: P1 d% e8 I4 I6 T
may have similar precocious puberty.3/ b+ S) N" N# p+ |" W) M9 T/ H
In our patient, physical examination was incon-
* S, V' S }6 V, E5 [! x' P& j) ysistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-4 F* d9 u" _, E. f
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
! A) v% {" z3 {$ }" w. o) F- g' T5 bwas in the differential diagnosis because his father2 e8 {- Z& J% U- z' B
started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
& V# t' Q5 p- t0 [2 dtesticular enlargement is not that evident in the
4 ^# G* z5 s3 j1 X6 g5 A8 ubeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
. Z I2 T# e& T6 {$ L' l! @ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
a% q, G& {2 Fbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,
. A3 n1 r# Y7 ]# _' }) w r, qeither 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase. |3 K6 O) J$ h+ R) A! m
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
$ a$ z% x A9 u! ~+ qing the normal level of adrenal steroids.
6 h: F( B9 W& @" U% |, UThe diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly4 ~- N- q+ @( n: v' m
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because# ~7 P6 l3 b! R+ B6 n
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-- ^$ U' m- |2 ^7 I0 j
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and5 a8 j* F( o7 }
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-0 x; ^/ p7 {8 w' _9 V, _
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was& j$ r2 }2 g: C" e
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
0 U: i6 G. a0 t7 C3 hDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or+ C, r9 ?- m/ L8 ?
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
+ ]8 Z4 @- y" \. `0 U" Cunprotected females through direct skin exposure.3 J3 P& p( Y/ ?$ J; f6 E) [* Z2 ]7 p
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
; ^* q: y" [% @/ ]baseline value in those females who were exposed to
% l0 v! I2 H7 W8 Y" beven 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male9 w4 `" ?8 r. o' P V! f1 @7 t: v
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
2 ^4 D+ m- E8 N5 ]$ F$ O9 Ition site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.; j4 B/ _+ K q, C8 j) u0 c
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
% |) j( l* R& g3 d+ Gwhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
; v9 ^3 ~# F+ k7 u3 |dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
" g. j0 [# S0 {: j' jterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
+ \- Y# {4 F+ c0 Qactive in young children exposed to testosterone2 V# e0 B) D) ]7 S; S) ~# g
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-! n1 [# ?4 |, E! f. A& {. \
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
; z4 Z# }7 f2 `2 xvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
0 o v3 B1 ~+ @6 v4 s9 A" Fchildren results in an increase in growth velocity and
+ z( Y4 b# q9 a% Uadvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.2 }9 A) h* d$ v1 W# A
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during
9 T' I( w% I' k: _ Eearly childhood on pubertal development and final; V! S1 |0 @0 [/ O
adult height are not fully known and always remain
) O$ V4 b" n! r$ ga concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
+ J$ [3 X6 m6 U2 }8 ~# d+ \9 u' Wterone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
6 x9 Z5 }+ L! ~) w- ?1 i: Facceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
, E3 r" A6 C7 {0 D' ?" O; ~1 hcessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation* H, y1 D" r& \: I4 v4 T& h
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
) R5 u% m& V! A) U9 tThere are conflicting reports and controversy6 p k) e5 S5 O4 F2 ?" f# Q, N* G2 s
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult; v Q- o3 }7 {- \% P
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal2 X* Q U5 m0 {# s- t: Q3 [1 r, j
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
~) t+ Z4 w& ]. Q* culation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
0 u/ U C, {* K# U7 x9 USutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
2 k3 y- Q3 b% m$ T: rchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult" C+ U5 u6 O: k( c3 y: B1 r! j
penile length in clinical studies.
+ |8 J( f/ j7 @" v; o3 _Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is% x& I% y! t& z) s8 m( h9 B8 @& t
going to experience any of the untoward effects from' C4 t! u( j3 |/ F1 T
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because6 `; f `" U, T1 K C3 u3 O
the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.. g& W! D" `+ f+ f% H* P
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of$ D% i N, m% Z9 `9 r1 e1 D
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at
8 s# n$ l N, s( t, K, G7 I0 rthe follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult" E: ]9 L2 w, H- t
height will not be affected.
! c0 H. M l. G) G, Z7 QAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-/ p# m5 x! w* Q! ^. {3 n- `, W
ability of androgen products in our society may
. H2 G+ m- ?. q7 _7 T" |8 d5 N3 Kindeed cause more virilization in male or female J' _" Z- i9 ~8 F2 O# o0 z
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
q$ [( F* N- ]+ S. L' qgen products must be considered and specific ques-
. H. J7 t, ]' F5 ^' z. Ytioning about the use of a testosterone product or
5 a; n, G7 |3 v/ |& j0 wgel should be asked of the family members during d. Y* ~7 I, v3 E: P' G; s
the evaluation of any children who present with vir-
1 @6 a. G# y: b& Pilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-6 d. J+ M+ H0 s7 T) X2 ~
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by
( I* C+ g' X2 B9 h0 J/ a/ Dappropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
0 o" g" R4 V) A! K' F$ J* ^" b3 qhistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
6 e* |5 w3 }) G) n; D5 s/ Sresult in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive/ ?% p# E1 d0 |7 ^
investigation. The primary care physician should be
4 ^# r9 F! P0 X- p$ h+ j, N: Saware of this fact, because most of these children! [, A: F0 Y7 c, o
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’8 A2 M7 \7 {4 X2 Y, @
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a. c4 [$ V3 v" I) w. D' g& V4 b0 a! h
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
/ ]; P, P c+ Q2 C5 O# @5 ]female child who might come in contact with some-
9 V1 F+ J6 M; K, none using any of these products.
7 Q' A2 G5 Z% W ]$ mReferences
2 V! C* ^# w2 g. m% D% F1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation7 E& g6 b7 J: x, n7 Q, g" p# {
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric9 @: r; ^" p _
Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
2 ^7 E' v: ~- v# e' B. Y7 x2002: 565-628.
2 u' N6 `5 w3 M, k: e7 O- q2 z& _2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
* W* e i( E* p6 Q6 Tpuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|